![]() I came across Dyrii and in many respects it looks very attractive. So, wondering if anyone has any experience with either of these two apps, or any advice or thoughts about alternatives? re compatibility with future OS upgrades, etc.). This gives me pause, as I’d rather not invest (not just money but also especially time and effort) in an app that doesn’t have a clear future (esp. On the other hand, from what I can see, the program hasn’t been updated in more than two years. Re MacJournal, it has a number of attractive functions, including excellent formatting capabilities and a distraction-free mode in which all graphical elements are hidden/obscured so one can focus simply on writing. That an app primarily meant to deal with text is (dramatically) less capable than Apple's simple TextEdit app is disappointing and somewhat off-putting. one can't underline text, or set an arbitrary color. On the other hand, Day One's interface isn't particularly Mac-like, and it does not support rich text formatting - e.g. It's neat that entries here on MR.com can be tagged with not just one but multiple tags and then queried or sorted using those tags, and I highly value having that kind of flexibility in categorizing and retrieving journal entries. I’m currently considering several possibilities, including Day One and MacJournal.ĭay One is attractive for several reasons, including its robust iCloud synching and especially its flexibility with tags. I intend to make most of entries on my Mac with its keyboard, and less often with my iPhone on the go. I'm looking for a journaling app for my Mac and my iPhone. Learn more about what services we provide at. We have 10 years of experience working with BGP data and believe that our work can enable more companies to start keeping tracks of BGP data on their own turf. Issues and pull requests are welcome! Built withīGPKIT is a small-team start-up that focus on building the best tooling for BGP data in Rust. The obvious drawback is that we will have to duplicate information to save at each elem, that consuming more memory. The main benefit of using BgpElem is that the analysis can be executed on a per-prefix basis, generic to what the backend MRT data format (bgp4mp, tabledumpv1, tabledumpv2, etc.). For example, when a bundled announcement of three prefixes P1, P2, P3 that shares the same AS path is processed, we break the single record into three different BgpElem objects, each presenting a prefix. Each BgpElem contains a piece of self-containing BGP information about one single IP prefix. To facilitate simpler data analysis of BGP data, we defined a new data structure called BgpElem in this crate. BgpElem: per-prefix BGP information, MRT-format-agnostic For example, when trying to find out specific BGP announcements for certain IP prefix, we often needs to go through nested layers of internal data structure (NLRI, announced, prefix, or even looking up peer index table for Table Dump V2 format), which could be irrelevant to what users really want to do. MrtRecord record representation is concise, storage efficient, but often less convenient to use. The code definition of the MrtRecord is defined in the crate bgp-models ( documentation). The MrtRecord is the data strcutrue that holds the unmodified, complete information parsed from the MRT data file. ![]() MrtRecord: unmodified MRT information representation There are two key data structure to understand for the parsing results: MrtRecord and BgpElem. ![]() loop through data files found by broker for item in broker elems matches", elems. Let mut broker = bgpkit_broker ::BgpkitBroker :: new( "") set broker query parameters let mut params = bgpkit_broker ::QueryParams :: new()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |